IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC header format/demultiplexing (#426)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Thu, 30 November 2017 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F8B127B31 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 07:51:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.018
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W_fxY6PvXK2j for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 07:50:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o3.sgmail.github.com (o3.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68042129410 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 07:50:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=s5XsZ6ui4bAcywvHWqORlhQJXwA=; b=VXEwC3Nox9T+ItU7 gALZFRm1ciNgvJe0o7lEmXRh7o0nXcOU6H+qhEl68QHaxg7wYfzSnf1Kdz1JWy48 UyVf9T762qp8EioLhL+W6X2Fuk0U04obOaNnKYPp+rMHZwcMJFMrcu+dcu6/F+k/ vfgGEodyCf4AWd0shgDjxMzZOoc=
Received: by filter0052p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0052p1las1-11633-5A2028DF-27 2017-11-30 15:50:55.953166948 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0009p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id 9Iu1QZQbQw-KAVA1tYvuFw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 15:50:55.768 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 15:50:56 +0000
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab95309240b2f8acd1c90ee98a06e8c09c0ed05e6d92cf000000011637eadf92a169ce0d018204@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/426/348229442@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/426@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/426@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC header format/demultiplexing (#426)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5a2028df9e8d9_7693fc0020dcf304893ed"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3qql8xqBl1DsYLLQkCiWHC3ahyPjA3udbG9z inKtaNBI3PVYbKbh62zXoFFWro6RCu2zo81H+jhUFXdOVaNkRZU/vp3le6kff7MB+f6kk6QUZTQUvW L8lNiqYREWpCcocsxGraODRu2cqo5xiHa7kFHtm7dfC8snLETXrWH8Gpq++oViJS5z8sNPyp+zvWX7 s=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/55CstGObTMBdygZIt5vaZ9fp_UQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 15:51:00 -0000

I think it's worth considering all the relevant issues when making this change, because at some point in the near future, we need to stop changing the type byte for long enough to deploy some production code on the internet.  

As Marten said, switching back to "connection ID" from "omit connection ID" would leave us in a place where we can do anything we want with the remaining 6 bits, including greasing and/or spin and still be able to coexist easily with GQUIC, so I propose we do that unless there's a strong argument against it?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/426#issuecomment-348229442

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status