Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ICID or OCID? (#2926)

Mike Bishop <> Thu, 24 October 2019 19:43 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E37120020 for <>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.999
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BqQm0XwYiIQE for <>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17443120025 for <>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:42:58 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1571946178; bh=7h2amY6GdJm5t4X8TW+GQ29p8I/LLBgxIrDvqZrhpKQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Lyd5a2bcUASEVOi/pDl/aTGaJZ2zuNhg4gZvZUcCZjgpMF8tqwgiPlzlAmddVGD9n W//53nxlYsIo6eWivFN8iBmY6JMMOM+jg5E6moYqTL3AWhzFkxZZYwAjwxfBK9EYgw odNieeTcH/lfYD98RhA45NHJeczO+s4Us7SEe1jQ=
From: Mike Bishop <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2926/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ICID or OCID? (#2926)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5db1fec22aaf0_1a8a3fdc956cd96c552d7"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 19:43:02 -0000

This is a separate issue, about definition of these terms; #3011 is about whether these need to be separate concepts depending on the outcome of other issues.

@mikkelfj notes that the term "original connection ID" appears only to say that a client MUST NOT send one, and that literal string appears nowhere else in the document except the changelog.  This refers to the transport parameter `original_connection_id`, whose definition matches the description of the "Original Destination Connection ID" field in Retry and references Retry, but doesn't use that term.

I'd suggest using the names of the prohibited TPs in stating the client restriction, and referencing the "Original Destination Connection ID" field by name from the TP definition.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: