Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit CONNECTION_CLOSE in Handshake (#1274)

Nick Banks <> Mon, 09 April 2018 13:34 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBDE1270AB for <>; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 06:34:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.384
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.384 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=0.726, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d3rh2L-iJNaC for <>; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 06:34:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5E68120726 for <>; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 06:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 06:34:09 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1523280849; bh=ob1W4VpeQ+Vl+kVuY9O7F1guIrxI6Tpi3qub94kR80w=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=tBphkIQnFeQDvYxf3HKUfPH2F0C3zggMvU/jOB/d90lTEwoi2eaNhswFh44r6QHXm 1LoNLzYKqbd0DBb9QzSw+FBqG0M9sAJZAj8kGai6sm5GsTiniyZW09eiedxbWmz0OM 2GueeGOOOPmCpK348YQmkSq3h4tWNheOabPl28fc=
From: Nick Banks <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1274/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit CONNECTION_CLOSE in Handshake (#1274)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5acb6bd1d3079_8ed2ad33574eec87906e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: nibanks
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 13:34:12 -0000

I agree it can only work if the packet number isn't predictable, and that depends on the final scheme we decide to use for packet numbers. But if it isn't predictable, receiving a packet from an IP address that you sent the packet to, containing information that could only be retrieved from that original packet seems to me, to prove they can receive any packets sent to that IP address.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: