IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to send a server cleartext packet after the client has sent a finished message? (#829)

Christian Huitema <notifications@github.com> Wed, 04 October 2017 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F50133245 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 11:01:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GCmkHG_8vvyo for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 11:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext4.iad.github.net [192.30.252.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E578134317 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 11:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 11:01:55 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1507140115; bh=fhQcGIL2N/swpJsHsNrUSgJPcqXQoTW5U15dEhPinOM=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=l/bBV4y36fWkHfN0tKQwaG2sLcO2d0xRI8ipI4zblhNKsrvtqy/t7BaZvcZ7nrAVB +cIKXlVsPlH3dHZufn7OvEv5PfvhEy1bdZdeMnm8m331zME0dL1d5kwO6Pgd7xEh+p gD6LRJnnfcUceVK40vLr2wB8uBw8L7wLTyeuWtxA=
From: Christian Huitema <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab18d1b1049d62068fd788057df660bf15177f20d092cf0000000115ece41392a169ce0fa74353@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/829/334240106@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/829@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/829@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is it OK to send a server cleartext packet after the client has sent a finished message? (#829)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_59d52213b3028_73083fbe655eaf34725b3"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: huitema
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/5Q4wIhXRzgiBmKIDIL3L4z_WWDM>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 18:01:58 -0000

I am concerned that this creates a big special case. If I have to accept a clear text ACK for the Finished message, I need to keep track of the packet numbers that can be ACKed with that message -- ACKing 1RTT data would be wrong. That's a very big wart in the code.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/829#issuecomment-334240106

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status