Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Single Packet Number Space (#1591)

Nick Banks <> Wed, 01 August 2018 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E9B130DDF for <>; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 09:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.009
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nv9ocGjrGK03 for <>; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 09:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DB6A126F72 for <>; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 09:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=nr4Of3YiE+2+VPwhSk3xklUGKGw=; b=STut/gLSpRR0wTPY gOA8+diG/vHfGsWPVzTIcyJPySmIc4pdSu7mGL61HxjMdm5HXvEEtIZJLXlUIYgF irtUQyJosUioVXzDvxr931TzGBG1AOm7Tbfu13XRsf+Yx8SfEAFnkghgKNfsnK8Y kz8ZWnLHxE2LjBnMP2uy+apNrqE=
Received: by with SMTP id filter1284p1mdw1-5888-5B61DD7D-3 2018-08-01 16:19:09.242029463 +0000 UTC m=+583774.849841586
Received: from (unknown []) by (SG) with ESMTP id PjWf00rQQeKA7LBvnSQO-Q for <>; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 16:19:09.226 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3713840E6A for <>; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 09:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 16:19:09 +0000
From: Nick Banks <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1591/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Single Packet Number Space (#1591)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b61dd7d358a1_25923f7fcd2be6201891e1"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: nibanks
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0SdQXl6dLcmoYQY3OYjcCfCtqDGj08Nnm2sn 21gFGYNwjcdM3ELnD9DtnikgPyWDuimdE59jLPEr7jrBru+fVzsari+4x31+bvWTl0YTrZZtIDnRWm 9W8+v5ymjdwpl03//S9oFOvBw/bs9U6oELgi40/30bl2g60JZ1oANJGAp/wav/TW47ZluimO1wVIoF k=
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 16:19:12 -0000

@MikeBishop for that issue, I believe that if we don't send ACK frames in Initial packets and disallow PING / PADDING only packets, essentially requiring Initial packets to just contain CRYPTO frames (and PADDING), in both directions, if you get an ACK for a packet you didn't sent, then it would be OK to blow up. If someone is able to inject a packet with a CRYPTO frame that was accepted and acknowledged by your peer, then you are hosed anyways.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: