Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Move Generating Acknowledgements to Transport (#2916)

Jana Iyengar <> Wed, 11 September 2019 21:47 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D7B120096 for <>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:47:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WPKqaZqvjpBE for <>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C6111201B7 for <>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:47:37 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1568238458; bh=2xTZLDSrnXCcyjYR6qDD5Wb4KNpNPw+dwXZa07XAyL4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Ku/X1wB79lVjjrItjEPkf/ldBvztZGHg359GZ+eQVa4+e3YrWkf03RxbsBdVVnP0n eVdtRGPIKwlNKk4wxzTztgVClBatpS0LBiu4YY+E5KuhjxlF+bHw7M5RBJn74G5u72 EXWGuBoNh0XnX84CCZP7djAoYizqrBos+v0YylfU=
From: Jana Iyengar <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2916/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Move Generating Acknowledgements to Transport (#2916)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d796b79e556a_755e3fd8750cd9641883af"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 21:47:40 -0000

@ianswett : I think the ACK per RTT is sensible.... if the RTT is 1us, you still need to send an ACK in that timeframe if the sender is to send more packets. But yes, let's discuss that in a separate issue.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: