Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry packets? (#1233)
ekr <notifications@github.com> Mon, 19 March 2018 08:09 UTC
Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9EC120721 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 01:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.391
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.391 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ciJ19CzcZPBd for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 01:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o6.sgmail.github.com (o6.sgmail.github.com [192.254.113.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4454120227 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 01:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=yjfxhIQbhliq20RqOla2rksalaI=; b=xCUa+eHaKJIQzoPr uBqcREpuDm1OuI1mcsJIZMwjHvPtdqiZU/hhv8mi4cJRapDh2ym4udwd7q5WAjHn je3rR8ZBwu6SthSJY4JYmVqz0hse8bWAXbcYnfM8+b6x2KhBoHndmymkAXpfM9py 24VLXdUx/WK41O4AJhOAhneupCw=
Received: by filter0430p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0430p1iad2-10200-5AAF7033-13 2018-03-19 08:09:23.546290037 +0000 UTC
Received: from smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) by ismtpd0044p1mdw1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id uo2wSJ1OR-uZyBrFyx87Ow for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 08:09:23.515 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 08:09:23 +0000
From: ekr <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab26cb7ac7dac14b6035acdcce029f1234be3f48f992cf0000000116c7323392a169ce1241ad3b@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1233/374130500@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1233@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1233@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry packets? (#1233)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5aaf703343f0c_eb83fb491d7cf285337b7"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ekr
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1zLPU55ObeFoC+rZY5hADRIUrOz70+4wtbql 6a3hTk3YANOksfMMiN+HwGKxntL1EUerHfHrvnmwdzgu+UO62q+K4fbF/HICxQ3HjzAYAG7xiWR/Z7 IRLzDQKq9jWYrI9nZpZ+Z58wTpol/aT6SCCX4YK9YMxzBpQIyLPABLvZEw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/66FqXIEC0nTQgL_HPrmNHIgttbA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 08:09:26 -0000
Oh, I see you're going to claim it has a cookie or it doesn't. But that's not actually the same thing, because you might be using the cookie just to require a proof of reachability as an anti-crypto DoS mitigation -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1233#issuecomment-374130500
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry p… Martin Thomson
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry packe… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry p… Subodh Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry p… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry p… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry p… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry p… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we still need Retry p… Subodh Iyengar