Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Acknowledge stream resets too (#1400)

[afrind <[e-mail]>]

afrind commented on this pull request.

This subsumes 1399 but I'm not sure there's a dependency between them?  Might it be cleaner to only change the instruction bits and introduce stream cancellation?

> +
+A decoder MUST track increases to the largest acknowledged dynamic table entry
+caused by acknowledging a header block so that it can correctly generate the
+Table State Synchronize instruction.
+
+
+### Stream Cancellation
+
+A stream that is reset might have multiple outstanding header blocks.  A decoder
+that receives a stream reset before the end of a stream generates a Stream
+Cancellation instruction on the decoder stream.  Similarly, a decoder that
+abandons reading of a stream needs to signal this using the Stream Cancellation
+instruction.  This signals to the encoder that all references to the dynamic
+table on that stream are no longer outstanding.
+
+An encoder cannot infer from this acknowledgement that any updates to the

s/acknowledgement/instruction/ ?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1400#pullrequestreview-128608973