Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explain asymmetric confirmation condition (#2881)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Tue, 09 July 2019 07:35 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482C11201B3 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 00:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vFtzuqCpoLIp for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 00:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-24.smtp.github.com (out-24.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59E8712011F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 00:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:35:44 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1562657744; bh=AOEX+InRoMeX32pZFX/YskxZ0eD5ZS4pUzBgAoUULeA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=B6aaoZy9jTojtzQnV0xfER86GXM8l2iBQ66N8mO8wb9USbjFqS0V5sZcFYGK6YgJE xWkq9H1Ign9MdQBO6E32RnA9b57CSpEgU2zn5+mxHjaXTmUSAvCCrCcY90pq9UvptJ Z+FUD4AyrL7BfToOlTFyAOq5FKiIaVVqZDIgHPCs=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZ3G2PRUTXC7I7DELN3GF3FBEVBNHHBXQFRGE@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2881/c509527089@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2881@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2881@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explain asymmetric confirmation condition (#2881)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d2443d038d65_4ee83f81918cd9601741334"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/6UZTZJ3SxXNXcU--r1JM70GdKdc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 07:35:47 -0000

I considered that, and you refer to the fact that the cryptographic handshake packets are the ones that are sent when you have a loss detection timeout. And that these are the only packets that are sent.  I worded this carefully to say that you send 1-RTT, ack-eliciting packets.  Should I say "In addition to retransmitting crypto packets, ..." or something along those lines?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2881#issuecomment-509527089