Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explain asymmetric confirmation condition (#2881)

Martin Thomson <> Tue, 09 July 2019 07:35 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482C11201B3 for <>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 00:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vFtzuqCpoLIp for <>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 00:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59E8712011F for <>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 00:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:35:44 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1562657744; bh=AOEX+InRoMeX32pZFX/YskxZ0eD5ZS4pUzBgAoUULeA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=B6aaoZy9jTojtzQnV0xfER86GXM8l2iBQ66N8mO8wb9USbjFqS0V5sZcFYGK6YgJE xWkq9H1Ign9MdQBO6E32RnA9b57CSpEgU2zn5+mxHjaXTmUSAvCCrCcY90pq9UvptJ Z+FUD4AyrL7BfToOlTFyAOq5FKiIaVVqZDIgHPCs=
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2881/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explain asymmetric confirmation condition (#2881)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d2443d038d65_4ee83f81918cd9601741334"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 07:35:47 -0000

I considered that, and you refer to the fact that the cryptographic handshake packets are the ones that are sent when you have a loss detection timeout. And that these are the only packets that are sent.  I worded this carefully to say that you send 1-RTT, ack-eliciting packets.  Should I say "In addition to retransmitting crypto packets, ..." or something along those lines?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: