Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is "to the encoder" intended? (comment 2) (Issue #4968)
Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com> Mon, 09 May 2022 19:04 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31519C14F739 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 May 2022 12:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.118
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.118 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.575, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YINjCehc8OB7 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 May 2022 12:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-20.smtp.github.com (out-20.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.203]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C012C14F734 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 May 2022 12:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-d8ee988.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-d8ee988.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.25.61]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D482BE0804 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 May 2022 12:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1652123042; bh=IoD43b5GdTet5BMPE+k5x2P6FqANlbNWgqH2jO+hdMk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=tUcjBg79PrBEA1eQ8NmahigE5ozkGJgk3SMSBYd1+j0mYPH5L6gojhjmne/wzLMhr O6m6CT3VGOHf+u+fCRX7JYOgGm43IkvQeNqalkY+OziVMJL5WI7i/3F+e0CCIHtKGX Jme6PMGY7RWsufpztisn147m2eG0tqwyXjSqgwXE=
Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 12:04:02 -0700
From: Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK4JK5GVYGK676ZLKGGAQ2MCFEVBNHHEMZM6EI@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4968/1121467166@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4968@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4968@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is "to the encoder" intended? (comment 2) (Issue #4968)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_627965a2c5c2a_4ddcd40816284"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/6ehG_FjMzX24gcRSLH2pyBaB4HE>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 19:04:05 -0000
Some alternatives (aka throwing mud at the wall) 1. "The design of QPACK requires a encoder to implement relatively more-complex state tracking than a decoder." 2. "QPACK's design requires state tracking in various degrees of complexity. In relative terms, encoders have complex requirements, while decoders are more simple. 3. "QPACK is designed to put the state tracking complexity onus on encoders, resulting in relatively simple decoders." -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4968#issuecomment-1121467166 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4968/1121467166@github.com>
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Is "to the encoder" intended… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is "to the encoder" inte… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is "to the encoder" inte… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is "to the encoder" inte… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is "to the encoder" inte… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is "to the encoder" inte… Mike Bishop