Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Required state for retaining unacked RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID frames is unbound (#3509)

ianswett <> Thu, 26 March 2020 21:57 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B9A3A0A03 for <>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 14:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.008
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.008 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u4UYBBqpbAPa for <>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 14:57:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C5733A087B for <>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 14:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B21C61742 for <>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 14:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1585259820; bh=0YIoub3beWi4SEXT2XSieMlpNnpwRtdEv/GDF+teWfU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=yet+Gu7sWZ7YCiWVFt8uVgi4IJzhDo7758Xfba4QzULobyVE6ixfsRci623wjDXBv pMlQRna+UkFd3wMKvU3E75eDQWL7grqgyLw+0l/d9pI/Ie0X+2QIatqV+QSDfoNw2J kNTmJFpVjexO1d94kRv3IjtwE6lW/26iONa85fos=
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 14:56:59 -0700
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3509/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Required state for retaining unacked RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID frames is unbound (#3509)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e7d252be80a5_7d0c3fdb6d0cd964135044"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 21:57:05 -0000

One idea: Can we simplify everything by not requiring sending RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID for CIDs less than the Retire Prior To?  RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID would then only be used when a CID was used and needed to be retired so more CIDs could be issued to the user of the CID.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: