Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] allow PRIORITY frames referring to placeholders exceeding `SETTING_NUM_PLACEHOLDERS` (#2761)

[Lucas Pardue <[e-mail]>]

LPardue commented on this pull request.



> @@ -1202,9 +1202,15 @@ The following situations are examples of invalid PRIORITY frames:
 A PRIORITY frame with Empty bits not set to zero MAY be treated as a connection
 error of type HTTP_MALFORMED_FRAME.
 
-A PRIORITY frame that references a non-existent Push ID, a Placeholder ID
-greater than the server's limit, or a Stream ID the client is not yet permitted
-to open MUST be treated as a connection error of type HTTP_LIMIT_EXCEEDED.
+A PRIORITY frame that references a non-existent Push ID, or a Stream ID the
+client is not yet permitted to open MUST be treated as a connection error of
+type HTTP_LIMIT_EXCEEDED.
+
+A PRIORITY frame MAY reference a Placeholder ID that is equal to or greater than
+the server's advertised value of the `SETTINGS_NUM_PLACEHOLDERS` settings.  The
+server SHOULD ignore PRIORITY frames that specify such placeholders as the
+prioritized element.  The server SHOULD use the root of the tree as the

That looks better now.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2761#discussion_r289441411