Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Articulate error code principles (#2880)

MikkelFJ <> Tue, 09 July 2019 10:08 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22492120400 for <>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 03:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iRqwLfb8WDP5 for <>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 03:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 686021203FC for <>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 03:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 03:08:39 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1562666919; bh=6uNG31VxP46B5kBAVwsMQN6GxJKzejKX93MtwbbolX8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=TwkFylL3rt/g6qE0Bc4/am/bFJ08HuTryXsJMZE/UGn2Kr7eL0lEyPvkiFnfr1mFC 054RTJwQTN4+xAZbaHW5MiNcXKz6HbRSLBQkFKX8N9L7JDMMP32yL3i/Ivb8q00fjz bMQogsL/38oHCfBNwcsLqUtXtsDC2QDJOOjv9XPw=
From: MikkelFJ <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2880/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Articulate error code principles (#2880)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d2467a710a28_74e33fe331ecd96c145283"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 10:08:42 -0000

>  The idea that you pick the most helpful error is not something that we need to codify (in my view).

This I do not disagree with. I was merely suggesting that we explain why, as a general rule, a hard error is preferred as a design principle, not the nature of the error message which I do think should have a large degree of freedom.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: