[quicwg/base-drafts] Reserved versions will "probably" never represent a real protocol? (#2430)

Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Wed, 06 February 2019 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38086130F35 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 10:58:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.935
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y3X5kxnn-HTb for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 10:58:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-6.smtp.github.com (out-6.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5391E130F29 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 10:58:22 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 10:58:21 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1549479501; bh=Vs1nqWXqcJZGMt2dGaG6ALm4Pn6bJ6c2Jc2AO7RN0F8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=X3xm7/zJTy2Uxv6FdrS4lMN22Ar5eIFfA5CzSiWCn6Q9XPqCbfjt25n1gMboB3Phf Hkgyw2zn0BpBGajC4Wjas3CrAyNlmnwP7OyJpV8zbO4VlOoDAgRBnFRIEoj2oDNCzJ ncuf8CHp7cuNP1e58g4HVbCE6cfzqSucivCJMkkA=
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab886e70194035c9e690f4d233c6d9c03691c2a4d792cf000000011872f04d92a169ce18482873@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2430@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reserved versions will "probably" never represent a real protocol? (#2430)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c5b2e4d293d0_4c483f9ab22d45c4101858c"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/6qz8SbP0HW32pGzL8hl9Y85k92s>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 18:58:24 -0000

This seems unnecessarily wishy-washy.  Either they're reserved by definition, and therefore **will never** represent a real protocol, or they're available for use.

We should remove the "probably" unless there's a good reason to keep it that I'm missing.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2430