[quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-path calculation of RTT of QUIC flows (#631)
Brian Trammell <notifications@github.com> Wed, 14 June 2017 14:25 UTC
Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D90012EA81 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.021
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.021 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YAfqLxSOnIMD for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o1.sgmail.github.com (o1.sgmail.github.com [192.254.114.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B47BD12944A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=wsI5PkpMfnVxEsJuX8T5oqBZvcA=; b=M0E6NPw0qcykSbtS 6yDcbGPA7F3u3YyMi9AJtt3dQe8ykvI+EDeHnmhp6MypjKSa7pQ9I+l0B0pqgRhD /Ga+TcdWnBow9YvKinyx44ny8UK8AZ/jR9mojNfLPJaY3vHbt/RqSvx7+dUz1RvM p9UeaJLmT4sczRpc/5+uCKKzFXs=
Received: by filter1073p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1073p1mdw1-4749-59414741-31 2017-06-14 14:25:05.531242888 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0006p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id QkSDP-3TS7-hjx7C8r5kLA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:25:05.473 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:25:05 -0700
From: Brian Trammell <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abbdfb4761bc4fc1054c9febf08dfa8d11aeb7af7992cf000000011559094192a169ce0e0f8270@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/631@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-path calculation of RTT of QUIC flows (#631)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5941474156702_9333fce47e55c2c368df"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: britram
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1gN/pFMc/+OHnOTmvin4dfK+oBoYCG/Q2G9B SAqbKdtBu0oYVnzfbhY/7fprzAtpobAIVzYAs00i5w/AnSaTAVHtZiRRL65IjyU2/xA4x2Qo6w8nkj Pm+3zW9qtaSr7HiDtYBlKJkXZ1TiKek3cQ8Zo4mac7y2yzNDi/dzkC8ijXI5kc3C57/tXBCIQCCTIn Q=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/6x-OxwWFTQ2T78LWujWAARIui4k>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:25:09 -0000
As discussed at the interim, it might be desirable to allow devices on-path observing two sides of a QUIC connection (or the subset of a multipath QUIC connection) to accurately estimate the RTT of the flow, either for in-band operational purposes (AQM) or general monitoring and measurement purposes (cf. an informal survey of IPFIX information elements suggesting multiple vendors shipping devices that perform this measurement for TCP.) This facility should require bilateral agreement of both endpoints before an RTT signal is available on path; i.e. it should be optional. This was a large part of the requirement behind #269, #391, and #393, which were expressed in terms of mechanism instead of requirements. #609 contains a proposal addressing this issue which is separate from packet numbering, and is therefore compatible with proposals to make packet numbering inaccessible to on path devices (see #231) This issue was filed in part to uplevel the discussion on #609 to requirements. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/631
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-path… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… Patrick McManus
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit support for on-… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of R… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of R… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of R… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of R… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of R… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of R… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of R… mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of R… ihlar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of R… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of R… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of R… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of R… janaiyengar