Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Guidance for port number use (#495)

Igor Lubashev <notifications@github.com> Fri, 15 September 2017 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D0F1321BB for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 14:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lmtWC0PFR63v for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 14:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o4.sgmail.github.com (o4.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 632AB133209 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 14:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=i+deDfpcn1kF6u7PgYZV5AwGEUc=; b=Y2gYWG6mJAWEwUt/ vS2Vwr5EuIhWdDzjRw1kd0bNSRZSi+WoSGU/QPmor/PADE9ue1pk/8euyRWKcHRh Sm6u4FOb7sDI9KI6zC3irJTefLwNupeeNKJGbAmu9ZH6b437wfT8esgmkm4Cstd7 0a5DNEvsD9Cra/dz7W1q2oLQPEc=
Received: by filter0560p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0560p1mdw1-30946-59BC4747-18 2017-09-15 21:33:59.461868459 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0046p1mdw1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id fEtHntAYQ3qu6ZyklDoeow for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 21:33:59.398 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 21:33:59 +0000
From: Igor Lubashev <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab9e4e10312820b7620cd3f33685e470707f210d0692cf0000000115d4094792a169ce0d78bf28@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/495/329909475@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/495@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/495@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Guidance for port number use (#495)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_59bc474721034_1d883fbc1fbd3c2c8593d"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: igorlord
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2HVM8w7P2fPPA8A3SL6TMcEtc8LNcd3gQ46Y ca/OBoVE4p3I2NB4G5WS2XbuE/MMAdpco8tfFhIZbNjNX/yFBUEQFL/Hhvk2MNt3XMjkeWhcp3oqyv r+Ge2ITCClStVupeo/ARTk3dPbi1NRsy9JeWDr/WMP7P1GRJwc6tgJjvsVEaZbT2+55S00lJM2ZhhU 0=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/705HLaP2V-52rr_XGnPlaOLyhAk>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 21:34:01 -0000

@bemasc 
> Multihosting QUIC on IPv4 without SNI.

I believe TLS 1.3 requires SNI, and QUIC requires TLS 1.3, so SNI is required for QUIC.  Is that incorrect?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/495#issuecomment-329909475