Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3 unidirectional streams arms race (#2559)

Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Wed, 27 March 2019 03:26 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBB7120158 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 20:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QjCK0vc3nUcb for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 20:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0712C120132 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 20:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 20:26:17 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1553657177; bh=/KR8IAvm81WzecwYuC89TwHo1QS08+ygrFl9n4cQLr0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=NHLaGHGkNH9zA/JqgWwBmiKq6tgRHNsHvRZUj9obmvgZgbLfViyygBwiPVDyL2r8l hkjtHAY6TyEDWnDEkXKo2iCqWSFyEPkpTpzDlRkWYWYwP+vjl7IU0Qs13tFso2/tPU JlQevkXpWXpLRJx9G7/xIoMfMfDodyz8HYLDRm74=
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab83aa1ae9285cc9fc597993700d0535f431f298fe92cf0000000118b2af5992a169ce196054ab@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2559/476955236@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2559@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2559@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3 unidirectional streams arms race (#2559)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c9aed598dd42_2b893fa6bded45c411396c"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/73OUc3qG_JLyLvte-JKw9rg8AlI>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 03:26:21 -0000

> c) will this just devolve to a cycle of one endpoint sending STREAMS_BLOCKED and the other echoing back MAX_STREAMS (value +1) until the other side shuts up?

It seems to me that this is the worst case, and that if we think it's fine then every other questions can be considered fine.

My position is that having this worst case is fine.

Many types of greasing (e.g., version negotiation, retry, HelloRetryRequest) introduces one extra roundtrip. So having one extra round-trip when opening one greasing stream sounds not unreasonable.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2559#issuecomment-476955236