Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] qpack: successful header block processing as opposed to what? (#1586)

afrind <notifications@github.com> Thu, 19 July 2018 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F93130F6C for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dTm56vqZ41qq for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o8.sgmail.github.com (o8.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 158C2131112 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=Fbi8Bi1MBCCw6GZnW++CPIy8J8c=; b=id8j7lKfZb9qsa/+ cy4ZgmIEubKZJ7wFaOgg/QWwObEPzxZFj73N4YHAZNJR9usDuEWmSIl2rt/NdZiY yGatAtaLkYu6ahF6n9pc+gpdCUURM5JqASPIjvgycPQNpy+sok3w9MLJgZgqWDvx bUy48u9YxV+2qZbbnDm6ZoOnKJE=
Received: by filter0323p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0323p1iad2-15270-5B50D02D-11 2018-07-19 17:53:49.611639932 +0000 UTC m=+153574.608708462
Received: from github-lowworker-baaab27.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.33]) by ismtpd0001p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id YtBXb35TS3WcVVQwP0JnuA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:53:49.496 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-baaab27.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 735CC80304 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:53:49 +0000
From: afrind <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab0f5d542c1ad44f9597402f674481e8e020d7d34e92cf000000011768922d92a169ce146a2565@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1586/406361662@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1586@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1586@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] qpack: successful header block processing as opposed to what? (#1586)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b50d02d6a04c_3cd33fe3436ccf581273d3"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: afrind
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2KNoHTLKN8WLC4bwNvx4cdAj24hqKA1omgrE KLUMdb3qqwA6qI+eaNSjGkuVJsklNwgeS4krkAXDICv2KER9nLBlR6LOqcknXadyLQAtvldrGYj/k2 E5TsCFydc4jTQ2hHB9CvBuDaduc2BDSSYFbhy+Qx+j+WtoP860/FohWkbhsd/PRuc0KWIm0UgPlD2+ I=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/7KlOJMMLLqh1z_fEZV9mjLDFICU>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:54:00 -0000

I think I prefer complete/completely to nothing at all.  Do you think saying "Completed processing of a header block" increases mental load?  Just saying "processing of a header block" might mean that processing has started.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1586#issuecomment-406361662