Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Persistent Congestion Time Threshold (#2365)

Nick Banks <notifications@github.com> Wed, 30 January 2019 21:28 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C6A131024 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:28:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87rUvljtUItk for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:28:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-4.smtp.github.com (out-4.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D990130FF4 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:28:46 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:28:45 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1548883725; bh=tvfHJ/FEUeg132hgn1cXJ1V1sPnwHgvBv9e0CVfDFg8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=y/LDAvUyd353lzHIlEuIjU7b4tryLIZ01yA4D2pl8N0PY2f0cx6nxvD1IcTWGXuwu DAcioBrpz6HYzkTfXLbxoTTxQcSnybTqmS1DOm2jTgNkcR3wye40YTY3Tc/0090jtR 0sH6Rrp7zVhdJeofWOlcnDoV2TZ4E8BA1m2EDHMg=
From: Nick Banks <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab8fd4a27085b5c7c35bfa5f66db4382bbf8dc4ac492cf000000011869d90d92a169ce17fab1f6@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2365/review/198315897@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2365@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2365@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Persistent Congestion Time Threshold (#2365)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c52170d41662_57c23fd97e8d45b8301320"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: nibanks
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/7TYS2bmmuanqUFN3nPCp7q9bOKI>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 21:28:48 -0000

nibanks commented on this pull request.



>  
      // Start a new congestion epoch if the last lost packet
      // is past the end of the previous recovery epoch.
-     CongestionEvent(largest_lost_packet.time_sent)
+     CongestionEvent(newest_lost_packet.time_sent)
+
+     // Collapse congestion window if persistent congestion
+     if (InPersistentCongestion(oldest_lost_packet.time_sent)):

Since this only happens in response to an ACK, IF we made any change, I think the change would need to be congestion_time equals the time between the oldest packet lost and the oldest packet acknowledged. That being said, I'm not convinced we really need to make that change. For instance, when comparing to TCP RTO, it's a timer from the oldest packet (or ACK) to Now().

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2365#discussion_r252444932