Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Changing protocol elements: Is this text strong enough? (#2985)

Mike Bishop <> Tue, 08 October 2019 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8610812080F for <>; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 12:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bxOwf-SwIyto for <>; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 12:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B7D4120033 for <>; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 12:29:39 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:29:38 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1570562978; bh=ZpSazE98srDsLrMU+fuA3ViIlJpDhywOOA6Z128an8Q=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=fX1d0aihZGBg4M6szuFRrqbsR1Dy0+AN+uBxAycvkxc4iYOilfsNVXCO1fSe8f2sg TQaIQkfetiGjDOuxkXUtBQcXiPOnqFfgomIjmY83OKyKFnE64R9DIIuq3P+5zT4lb3 gp1HsvuZAkuRP3Vny9LVrvmxPxhvBy8Kke9fjbcQ=
From: Mike Bishop <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2985/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Changing protocol elements: Is this text strong enough? (#2985)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d9ce3a272e24_28903fd025acd96c397eb"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 19:29:52 -0000

Your extension could define a frame that simply means, "I pinky swear I won't ever use the old frames again."  But then you have all the same cross-stream coordination issues.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: