IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-eliciting packet once (#3092)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Thu, 24 October 2019 20:13 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE03B120099 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 13:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6XLI2QWDUnPZ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 13:13:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-20.smtp.github.com (out-20.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.203]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBDE812008C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 13:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-45eca55.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-45eca55.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.25.70]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B268C1245 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 13:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1571948010; bh=nllMNDJIXLQ06/eMpdma54z8wnaPFXdrrcU4GhS28iw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ZhKZCrHsd1P1JO3og3IIzMc9pQzu83uknsv4L1mKJJzmnBsWdjerVDmWRk0DHq6rp UF549XID/J4mkxW8P70Xf0meBBSDDEoo0fZdyuvcGSh/7cKakP0AAjHDC6c8Vy9JwL 2FflmQjP2+z0zpG1gPbAa6PhxPzYgzG9lI2LUI0A=
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 13:13:29 -0700
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK37S3HVELQZFACSO353X5DHTEVBNHHB4ODZTE@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3092/review/306835397@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3092@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3092@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] MUST ACK each ack-eliciting packet once (#3092)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5db205e9e988e_cd63fcd04ccd95c40612f"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/7WLAWJQOfkf9_XrXZ1Wo0JCmjo8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 20:13:33 -0000

mikkelfj commented on this pull request.



> +Every packet SHOULD be acknowledged at least once, and ack-eliciting packets
+MUST be acknowledged at least once within the maximum ack delay. An endpoint

True, I forgot that a specific PN can be present in one ACK frame on not in the next, even if there are both older and younger PNs in the next ACK frame. This makes it inconclusive.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3092#discussion_r338770021

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status