Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PRIORITY frame on control stream referencing unopened request stream (#2502)

Patrick Meenan <> Fri, 10 May 2019 00:03 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 442A51200FD for <>; Thu, 9 May 2019 17:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.918
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BxMGonS4u5lR for <>; Thu, 9 May 2019 17:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DCFC1200DF for <>; Thu, 9 May 2019 17:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 17:03:52 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1557446632; bh=O2gZ/GrkHaq3cr3SLW1u5DChwdxdwLr4FiKTDU4/Bq4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ng6vtG6xLgO/EV5Np9v0mN2VefH078B+S1iYYcE41JSphYP9gFgrhSRJfQvoZ4Pqn AsWiIip6w9zdPTTbI5d59NIc7Z1JR8hVw6H6iuEbhGqgcQ+Jj83lx0M4wOuK6g9gJH evJlsCSQIOSqNrjKkdG9sCdJatDMNYhj83VJ8ll8=
From: Patrick Meenan <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2502/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PRIORITY frame on control stream referencing unopened request stream (#2502)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cd4bfe85c9de_4d9a3f9cd90cd9641098a4"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: pmeenan
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 00:03:55 -0000

> This would be the case. And the cost is incurred only when there is a packet loss. To be precise, there would be 1 RTT penalty to synchronize the prioritization tree for every loss event of a packet carrying PRIORITY frame.

That wouldn't be a problem at all. You'd likely get more interruption than that in HTTP/2 if a TCP packet anywhere near a PRIORITY frame got dropped anyway.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: