Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC PTO (#3441)
ianswett <notifications@github.com> Fri, 28 February 2020 14:45 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DBF33A1935
for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 06:45:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.696
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1,
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Zi2X_PInx1QQ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 28 Feb 2020 06:45:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-24.smtp.github.com (out-24.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.207])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FADC3A1946
for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 06:45:10 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 06:45:09 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com;
s=pf2014; t=1582901109;
bh=XEk4rP/70pjPrXl98ZYyLKAvbEpidZif0hXAJPqowiY=;
h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID:
List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From;
b=posADb6qBzAQ4RKxg1K7lArBZfzhhaPmxe2Sy4RTJACckTiK7g34wh4a/CvWG4BT6
MeC0iVxK2UVT31IFLJuzVzs9mOWf6bHlMxQK2+GLAZSbkO/DJi7c1gscxNrOFkbXpA
vPHDfRTrY02uRbwHtho5D0cn1mAWuVTNFhegi4Fg=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
<reply+AFTOJK4FSOC7FDT44UNDD5N4MZM7LEVBNHHCC7S66M@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3441/review/366447232@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3441@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3441@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC PTO (#3441)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--==_mimepart_5e592775b413a_7fe13fb6486cd96c200529";
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/7e5FI5svAlwUSCOqwm-5GbG3FeE>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG
<quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>,
<mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>,
<mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 14:45:19 -0000
ianswett commented on this pull request. > @@ -228,6 +228,23 @@ QUIC endpoints measure the delay incurred between when a packet is received and when the corresponding acknowledgment is sent, allowing a peer to maintain a more accurate round-trip time estimate (see Section 13.2 of {{QUIC-TRANSPORT}}). +### Probe Timeout Replaces RTO and TLP + +QUIC uses a probe timeout (see {{pto}}), with a timer based on TCP's +RTO timeout. QUIC PTO includes the peer's max_ack_delay in the calculation, +instead of relying upon a fixed minimum RTO. Unlike TCP's RTO, which collapses +the congestion window upon expiry, QUIC does not change the congestion window +and instead allows sending probe packets whenever the timer expires. This is +similar to TCP with F-RTO, but it does allow more packets to be sent when the +congestion window was not fully utilized when the probe timeout expires. Though Why not? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3441#discussion_r385733412
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC PTO… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Document TCP RTO vs QUIC… MikkelFJ