Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Exhausting a supply of connection IDs (#1276)

Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Mon, 09 April 2018 18:07 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D0E12D870 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 11:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.384
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.384 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=0.726, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Bqw0lxBS9MS for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 11:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 993641273B1 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 11:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 11:07:20 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1523297240; bh=oNe2VgTy4/Nx5KV8CeTScz/uguH/kuiZ5Q64pP36MH4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=DhQYJLq1VyqWIRT9YRU8VNeB5Cg/QaK4IB1dknIj4r+I6gNJ4g3GWgLkYT0gKzxZI 5rH+aXYzWFpJElSV/vx1UVvFmhGvjqLHzWgCgRmtFL7fo94h+QlDeWEbqwUK2B+8Ad 08lAvUAwoZVe+L15O1nvKHSD9PFyVgp7GZVl29BU=
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abee8a4fc01188c0407c18eb8b3ca76cb8cdeedca192cf0000000116e36dd892a169ce129fe454@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1276/379842268@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1276@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1276@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Exhausting a supply of connection IDs (#1276)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5acbabd8a6042_65bd2b22814b6ecc1303cc"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/7gw3QnrwaLdRX_1gIjgOIq_xb1Y>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 18:07:22 -0000

I thought we'd discussed and resolved that in St. Pancras', but I don't see it in the spec.  There are two versions of this:
- Client wants to migrate, but is out of CIDs:  0-RTT is probably the right answer here.
- Client has migrated, but server is out of CIDs:  Clients should be allowed / encouraged to include NCID in probing frames to avoid this.  Should servers be prohibited from sending until they get a new CID?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1276#issuecomment-379842268