Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Authenticating connection IDs (#3439)

Marten Seemann <> Thu, 05 March 2020 03:24 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 498673A0A3A for <>; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 19:24:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.696
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ydTWaL0vcoTf for <>; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 19:24:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E25BC3A0A31 for <>; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 19:24:55 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 19:24:54 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1583378695; bh=LN2kRry+bX5QBzLSOWZqVk1dnAvxc8Qvv32cZMVMwaI=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=K2+CSH8/WaxOgX7mC04iodjr/hvFn7B4dtJrY8vziCapywIVKIavuWErscTwHlUWs r9tjGpHRqQ/YQ9QBtCg0v5ZDYL5U8FsmP4mMy5jVgh4WNYCsyRjF21h3HcU4YpINhI 4YJT5btlhCGBkaRaYLaHdmbeHtdvxgqREwQfmYfQ=
From: Marten Seemann <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3439/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Authenticating connection IDs (#3439)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e607106e55a7_62413fa3878cd95c280524"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: marten-seemann
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 03:24:57 -0000

> @DavidSchinazi suggests that allowing the server to copy the client's ODCID when it is not sending a Retry would speed Google deployment. I think that is a reasonable request, but it does complicate things. I'd like to hear about that.

It would be nice to avoid any unnecessary complication. @DavidSchinazi, is this a Google-specific problem, or would this also apply to other deployments?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: