Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove EOED v2 (#1798)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Tue, 25 September 2018 20:00 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D0C130E11 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zK_0zcGZZJeL for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 12:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-6.smtp.github.com (out-6.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B06B2130DC6 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 12:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 12:59:54 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1537905594; bh=PHD+GMbJmHU9NSPjG/4OlGjDt8YBdJeWEjsgs6Ul1qA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=dbEvTPhvfLDfnhZhmoO5IyVjmS+X0viqXR45bNPw6RrjkyUETrASPGdTf5nX7A6G6 BgJ4hLReh9rDStdGKz3IX7XAO4tQ1de+29HSsxM+jnX9F2zlyPismtJnj6mAEZnGNX Gfa14ZrPhkm8wV6EpMwj3S7dcJuWefrAkwntfPsU=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab912b3712d4572a8d6323df0a40baabc5bac9119792cf0000000117c255ba92a169ce15adbc52@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1798/review/158718706@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1798@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1798@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove EOED v2 (#1798)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5baa93ba8e178_56a23fe302ed45c0127266b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/7mLUhsfltW4ZlRfospz-fatC1vg>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 20:00:05 -0000

ianswett commented on this pull request.

Some small suggestions that may apply to the other PR as well.

> @@ -656,13 +655,14 @@ all the acknowledgements necessary to reach the same state.
 
 After all CRYPTO frames for a given encryption level have been sent and all
 expected CRYPTO frames received, and all the corresponding acknowledgments have
-been received or sent, an endpoint starts a timer.  To limit the effect of
-packet loss around a change in keys, endpoints MUST retain packet protection
-keys for that encryption level for at least three times the current
-Retransmission Timeout (RTO) interval as defined in {{QUIC-RECOVERY}}.
-Retaining keys for this interval allows packets containing CRYPTO or ACK frames
-at that encryption level to be sent if packets are determined to be lost or new
-packets require acknowledgment.
+been received or sent, an endpoint starts a timer.  For 0-RTT keys, which do not
+carry CRYPTO frames, this timer starts when the first packets protected with

The 0-RTT timer can be much more aggressive than 3 * RTO, since nothing now ever needs to be retransmitted at 0-RTT, it can always be sent with 1-RTT keys instead.

> @@ -656,13 +655,14 @@ all the acknowledgements necessary to reach the same state.
 
 After all CRYPTO frames for a given encryption level have been sent and all
 expected CRYPTO frames received, and all the corresponding acknowledgments have
-been received or sent, an endpoint starts a timer.  To limit the effect of
-packet loss around a change in keys, endpoints MUST retain packet protection
-keys for that encryption level for at least three times the current
-Retransmission Timeout (RTO) interval as defined in {{QUIC-RECOVERY}}.
-Retaining keys for this interval allows packets containing CRYPTO or ACK frames
-at that encryption level to be sent if packets are determined to be lost or new
-packets require acknowledgment.
+been received or sent, an endpoint starts a timer.  For 0-RTT keys, which do not
+carry CRYPTO frames, this timer starts when the first packets protected with
+1-RTT are sent or received.  To limit the effect of packet loss around a change
+in keys, endpoints MUST retain packet protection keys for that encryption level
+for at least three times the current Retransmission Timeout (RTO) interval as
+defined in {{QUIC-RECOVERY}}.  Retaining keys for this interval allows packets

I think the key goal here is allowing retransmitted CRYPTO data to be acknowledged with the correct encryption level?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1798#pullrequestreview-158718706