[quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to other ack-eliciting packets (#4000)
ianswett <notifications@github.com> Sun, 16 August 2020 19:46 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73AB3A10E2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 12:46:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.482
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.482 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jCAaezEa4Yk2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 12:46:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-26.smtp.github.com (out-26.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 668723A10E1 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 12:46:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-f045d1f.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-f045d1f.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.19.54]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C005E0EAA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 12:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1597607164; bh=H5/t4wrCG/pQTQmWAPkFMyUdQL+vIT0e+g7llLPrXI0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=et4J6cPTpUNaQDUgoqABTfhra+pF4rkmjEraKHeYh4w+oBMYmBSX57LLfv2KmJ10M 2EQaxhQ5r9Rtx030Hd33bIrjsEau+zyyVaz6p2Scy27HEFcIEenlsSL2yUfCrT9mQD kBcgrGl2eb7rDeADuVmejpvOTSg2c7GlfyM1HRoQ=
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 12:46:04 -0700
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZZJLO3I3IDDWQK6DV5IVW7ZEVBNHHCRBJDQE@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4000@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to other ack-eliciting packets (#4000)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f398cfc88c04_3cf2196415324f7"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/8BRRjEwqjMCNDQNQGmACOGC3vaM>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 19:46:07 -0000
I believe this was the existing intent, so not filing an issue, people can feel free to disagree. The case I'm concerned about is an ACK arrives with PN 10, then PN 9 arrives. I do not believe PN 9 should not be considered 'out-of-order' and trigger an immediate ACK. Recovery is designed with this case in mind, but when re-reading this text, I thought it was unclear. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4000 -- Commit Summary -- * Out of order relative to other ack-eliciting packets -- File Changes -- M draft-ietf-quic-transport.md (10) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4000.patch https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4000.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4000
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to oth… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Out of order relative to… Jana Iyengar