Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use "Insert Count" rather than "Largest Reference" (#2111)

afrind <> Thu, 10 January 2019 01:36 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3FD41310E7 for <>; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 17:36:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.149
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R1NPC_NJlDow for <>; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 17:36:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3D32131127 for <>; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 17:36:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=G3/3gTEyCaF/oMVhP44D1tm6YKw=; b=SZu0TPB8KqjXrbIn 4GHN0mk09QxsgVKzsizHS6d+u4Ra1bTrYStA6PWB4xKWrBTYWiEcvTl211GrwIWx dKwO8hdxS71xer70B9ZIlV6e2N2Lr4NLK21FtbM4/drJ0wXi2WcSCmZpkZtKikuU XIvf9gqSIYQtN+IwEPoyeJqDn2U=
Received: by with SMTP id filter0023p1iad2-27860-5C36A18B-E 2019-01-10 01:36:11.527462585 +0000 UTC m=+165106.855932699
Received: from (unknown []) by (SG) with ESMTP id R05nXvsBQKeFybUTuVLSlA for <>; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 01:36:11.459 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E33BAE035C for <>; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 17:36:11 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 01:36:11 +0000
From: afrind <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2111/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use "Insert Count" rather than "Largest Reference" (#2111)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c36a18b6c50b_34453fb80a8d45bc1106e4"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: afrind
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2m9SCMcMDK9gu1t6NrJHiAndccKc1QyPzXHG HqpvjkwhJC7MRRQ1tbS+8580/LVcJZwk3UG5l5eoauITTRTSt4Hwqtqod6d4IYif/pSyGj5alxmtad MPZA2481bwCbh0tIcbZG5HjK3dhjlX54p5shBhZbWEMX+CBTSziSXPrGEw==
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 01:36:18 -0000

afrind commented on this pull request.

> @@ -708,17 +726,17 @@ become blocked, as described in {{state-synchronization}}.
 {:#fig-size-sync title="Table State Synchronize"}

Insert Count Increment is much more specific than Table State Synchronize.  The description is good.  Sadly, it doesn't have the same ring to it, but I suppose clarity is more important.  I don't really like Delta, Increment is better.  We could also keep TSS and just put Increment or IC Increment or something in the little box.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: