IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Tweak the split between quic-transport and quic-tls drafts (#3717)

Christian Huitema <notifications@github.com> Sat, 19 September 2020 00:48 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643A33A0EE2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.703
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.703 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.695, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FJqEvLXmOo13 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-22.smtp.github.com (out-22.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 411E13A0953 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-ca235ff.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-ca235ff.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.110.15]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 519B656005F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1600476521; bh=SoEMfWo1rjQifRD3w4QEfGSDTIEr14iHReygR8AEGgs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=PodCIt1vi7xCcxUH0yHhHSUYwGPq1yEIwFcn0cVBhWlY/1dIyuDYaeJzO6wO2xSb+ 4gYOuY6JoanqWD6NOQQTs++4oimh/V21SuXZsER2gCde2p4g6M/SMqcINT8CbcJ+TS Dt6H59pnJbyhJ6kVHM4XgvDTiQH9Mi5YV5jxJX4E=
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:48:41 -0700
From: Christian Huitema <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK4EV6L3DNOTE5O7RUF5OE3GTEVBNHHCLE33VA@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3717/695140217@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3717@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3717@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Tweak the split between quic-transport and quic-tls drafts (#3717)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f65556941f98_63d219f01661fb"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: huitema
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/8NEc7Elrxki1zQjie7sH4U3eZvc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 00:48:43 -0000

The better is the enemy of the good. I wish we did these changes, because I wish there was no redundancy between the TLS and the transport draft. But then, with the current documents, we did manage to get a large number of implementations that all interoperate. There is a case for leave it as it and ship it now!

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3717#issuecomment-695140217

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email