From nobody Tue Aug 25 15:16:10 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504D23A03F5 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:16:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.153 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.153 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.048, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KSvBVJw5SWnc for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:16:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out-18.smtp.github.com (out-18.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D066C3A03F4 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:16:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from github-lowworker-45eca55.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-45eca55.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.25.70]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D819B340E87 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:16:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1598393766; bh=FQ2BE6JCecNu9+sl42piUxgPuQIdbzqgDDm73yEhdzE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=yxayupl7a9MDzlyhAQ3J/MCtNNf3++MLpcpGWWIEwXX/V5H/McZxPZm2gmMkj9wTv m4gmt0WY9Hz7Qfhcy2EQKMiV3+r7G9Q7eCTN+Nnmk6xEqidToRAYbKHiz0wa1Uwdxx SsRoM9KuSm3NbRReIwIKum+C1AzTVPUe2ibU7m4A= Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:16:06 -0700 From: afrind Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts To: quicwg/base-drafts Cc: Subscribed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should QPACK use the new layout? (#3999) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f458da6c40d1_621b1964103099"; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list X-GitHub-Sender: afrind X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org Archived-At: X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 22:16:09 -0000 ----==_mimepart_5f458da6c40d1_621b1964103099 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sounds like we have a preference for the existing layout over the new one. Closing this issue. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3999#issuecomment-680296529 ----==_mimepart_5f458da6c40d1_621b1964103099 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Sounds like we have a preference for the existing layout over the new one. Closing this issue.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

----==_mimepart_5f458da6c40d1_621b1964103099--