Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Order transport parameters (#3418)

Kazuho Oku <> Wed, 05 February 2020 11:13 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCCC12004C for <>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 03:13:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SKMrMzCQL-MV for <>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 03:13:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C6D2120018 for <>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 03:13:03 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 03:13:01 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1580901181; bh=SX2Dsyku/5LT7M3keT9aAoatNf5RWCli5s7Pvdz08yM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=SSGSSGYFH46GPb4ScHWsn2Ka5EzQh+LH8PeFRQc5/D7C/6IwlUMKA/AbVUGVImBFC Fi4mm6olJK8vDp5b3HhMwW0snsLpdT2jpWbNGLC05HzXkZ4GB3hHMoDFxLy3K3zL3R P1n0Eg/aAA1THdVZUK7bmvF/5vwbH34aEuHM6eRk=
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3418/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Order transport parameters (#3418)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e3aa33ddb4b7_15633fd8af6cd9608688f"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 11:13:06 -0000

My +1 goes to the proposal.

Enforcing the sender to send TPs in ascending order of TP IDs is much easier than trying to detect duplicates when TPs can arrive in any order.

Now that we've agreed to depart from TLS-based design, my preference is to fix this unnecessary complexity on the receiver side at the same time.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: