Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] compensation of ack_delay is fragile against errors (#2060)

Dmitri Tikhonov <notifications@github.com> Fri, 30 November 2018 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD971130DCD for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 07:08:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d0itEMqI7_Ee for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 07:08:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6116130DE9 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 07:08:47 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 07:08:46 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1543590526; bh=x84MxZTfsqu4vjXfIS+4a1JP1IG72JZbKk49sp352tc=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=F1LVM0Oolct758CjwXw9zXnKAgJMJ0pRAA1AR6dbsIAkQgML1F/e4FDYqzyNFTtiJ h4huslVkzIZQe+nJ9AwNgK5wUTCQbBsgNfRC5+XREQ2coeJdVPTmrAPi6SfsiQ4dQk EqtLtFXMnOPmMs9sNeoqAsKo4DbuBRyUAYB06Xnw=
From: Dmitri Tikhonov <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab683dae123384c746e30803a425e382a2f2aa12cf92cf000000011819147e92a169ce16f4226e@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2060/443232135@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2060@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2060@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] compensation of ack_delay is fragile against errors (#2060)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c01527e9652d_27933ff89bad45c0106df"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: dtikhonov
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/8pOTC-Dhc4pkOcspn_Q_irHU7T8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:08:56 -0000

@janaiyengar writes:
> Consider a clock adjustment at the client where the clock "caught up" with real time (I've seen this happen), and the reported ack_delay is quite large.

I hope you reported this as a bug to the client's implementers:  Most operating systems provide an monotonic clock.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2060#issuecomment-443232135