Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Renumber packet types and invert Connection ID Flag (#956)

Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com> Wed, 29 November 2017 17:10 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A75127B57 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:10:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.616
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.616 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8DiusqDX9EC8 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:10:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o9.sgmail.github.com (o9.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4E651273E2 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:10:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=nJwc2yMdD+xrp2tiaqrouxvQyeg=; b=eNm6QyyNfR9JiUEZ 6OkMrd6oFBdt4BIbRKkqEnM3dKlrpLvpLVzeaTeKAokhauHKIhCyhum1lsIkEQLQ uEiRIpvrBfpiSraKph+gx+IfclbLkOwt+LMs3MNLuNWcHkBnHlG+nl1IconUjS3g xjQ3rCQBlmZNE/SFPPSDk7dnPEQ=
Received: by filter0481p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0481p1las1-3158-5A1EEA11-12 2017-11-29 17:10:41.430281105 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0010p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id rUQepsHMSO-4cV4wbkXlYA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:10:41.338 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:10:41 +0000
From: Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab46cddabea6b6df9f1227da9d10d4733da231d6ea92cf000000011636ac0e92a169ce1075d33e@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/956/c347929195@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/956@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/956@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Renumber packet types and invert Connection ID Flag (#956)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5a1eea0ef29f1_75c3ff72430af38148041"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: marten-seemann
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
tracking:
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3i9PaZi+FXitC1XZIJyWZRVjXC5b0iWigB5V geopxZvglULKPc/nbyKS99diOzQYaDunUGFbrvay5OkcGB7pW66jqXORiUiNh7l3IZeMcobo1GkMHu Zv8aXGfMAZPYMYSbdusm+5iwbcMKr8fF1zJx7ps/k8zJnB6OLK+3VWIbflkcO+JAk+MBY+Z62MAUy6 Y=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/8tZDRNsYlSrDSs0piMHA_bYPEAo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:10:44 -0000

> But I believe the nonce bit is the bit that would end up being the spin bit, which could start making things pretty tricky.

That would be really unpleasant. What is the reason for inverting the Connection ID flag?
We had a type byte format that worked perfectly in all corner cases, and by merging this PR, we just destroyed this feature and create a big problem for all people who have gQUIC deployed.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/956#issuecomment-347929195