Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/QUIC without Alt-Svc? (#253)

MikkelFJ <> Wed, 30 January 2019 06:06 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E47A21311C0 for <>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 22:06:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.553
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6e7KmjTEpOyX for <>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 22:06:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F1CE1311B3 for <>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 22:06:40 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 22:06:39 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1548828399; bh=dQ2aFxew0Cp483MOI7EZvU4Ta59Ne3R7U9b7TRs1QOs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=bl/EEaT6eol7iNV1vqpV8UGNs/Tx8r/t0AyjlkmGrhkSrfruIECZ+lazmiJCbwU6H gkrvyFXG/qWu475RSxWM0DzRucbGY5U/OjbTBZHC4YlvkscXD380ypl/HSPf3rcG0W CyjQwHbfWTXJ1HY0/eOyP9sxbTR8Jl9iFbYJolbs=
From: MikkelFJ <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/253/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/QUIC without Alt-Svc? (#253)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c513eef9aa4b_2103fb5882d45c489763a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 06:06:42 -0000

How about making a solid DNS convention for alt-svc? If you use IP address directly, you probably also have port and protocol.

Fra: Lucas Pardue <>
Sendt: onsdag, januar 30, 2019 6:10 AM
Til: quicwg/base-drafts
Cc: Subscribed
Emne: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/QUIC without Alt-Svc? (#253)

I have concerns about how happy eyeballs plays out for HTTP connection coalescing. I think it can be specified in a way that resolves my concerns, and defining such guidance is crucial for making coalescing feasibly deployable.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<>, or mute the thread<>.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: