Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Boolean blocked streams setting (#3073)

Kazuho Oku <> Wed, 02 October 2019 23:36 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66DFD1200FF for <>; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 16:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K8dSsj5M2iUr for <>; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 16:36:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2709B1200F4 for <>; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 16:36:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 16:36:03 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1570059363; bh=W9SMTfmmmD2/fDjHqmgSJp4ZriGshuectqy1P2FIpsE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=MltWZrcptpfOm5BR+UkOKhibrkmmwzW724dwjVG7wx6B2JvPzZv+nOC4sgPTHI3h7 TkuP6+giZZzryiMb0oB+b7cnIap6cdvkhAACSrmbKGnscTSWGQ8u31+iujs6Z5Alag qwxcs+rk1jOobasRwYfWTSpWGdSAVxFQDinjM730=
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3073/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Boolean blocked streams setting (#3073)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d9534635d8ab_56223ff10cecd960454a7"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 23:36:06 -0000

I think I might be in favor of seeing the proposed change.

As @ianswett says, the flexibility that we would lose is very minor (i.e. the capability to limit the use of blocked streams to non-zero, but below MAX_STREAMS). I am not sure if there would be an HTTP application in which having such a requirement is important.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: