Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Lessen the divergence from the HTTP/2 prioritization scheme by requiring all PRIORITY frames to be sent on the control stream (#2754)

Kazuho Oku <> Thu, 23 May 2019 07:36 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C1D1200E0 for <>; Thu, 23 May 2019 00:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.392
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lXkM1CK_SK2M for <>; Thu, 23 May 2019 00:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B758120019 for <>; Thu, 23 May 2019 00:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 00:36:53 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1558597013; bh=E27AwfrN3GJNXJ3GcydKXUTMg7Go/KJf9mvdUhNdaqo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ZUWn1G0H1g7djzxDYyAV4Mh3p3rgoym5oPOdITq/dOdXX82p2tpSZlx8tEefALYAO +FMNw/RbT7wAa+f5J4xNxOES6kHE7pJTPINmkP5I4etzKobfM2ztvFAieJVbcypyan rMvD+XIOU0s3g99BJCJXrHFdt7AcN2Qo0GSVuBOg=
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2754/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Lessen the divergence from the HTTP/2 prioritization scheme by requiring all PRIORITY frames to be sent on the control stream (#2754)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ce64d95f90_4d133f8fb8acd96054569b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 07:36:56 -0000

> I'll attempt to summarize the issue: HTTP/2 priorities are different, but not better, and this creates implementation work and technical debt?

I disagree with the view. Our task is to port HTTP/2 semantics to HTTP/3. This is how you can do it, with less divergence than we have in the draft now.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: