IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Crypto retx timeout should have higher priority than time based loss detection (#2565)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Mon, 15 April 2019 14:05 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374F0120374 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 07:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.455
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JwmvNETMHyRF for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 07:05:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o11.sgmail.github.com (o11.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DFD6120187 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 07:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=hdDDzZ5//kRo09vZ0EBnEjwiE44=; b=bWWkQiBlnCC2UpQB y3snQdxzIRQSTpDG/PSuV5SHSzZ0NkgTqN4hjDaF5hsy88cnRBe+3h/qd4i1BC1i Me4SKwgz0alxx0rVU/V9XsX/TIh3WKmyOp9AYWzCZ6cE59hOxEvRdTizdxzMRqUF 0Mk9FGrGjOgR0tD0aTTU1Sm/SqE=
Received: by filter1816p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1816p1mdw1-2235-5CB48F92-32 2019-04-15 14:05:06.505868614 +0000 UTC m=+476893.047234663
Received: from github-lowworker-e8fa9ff.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.43]) by ismtpd0036p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id svnCAsZETmS9AZ6xH2I5BQ for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 14:05:06.511 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-e8fa9ff.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75FF542082B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 07:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 14:05:08 +0000
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abbf3e1eb966feeac83c7ab9ec82891f4dec37a9a392cebac1c21292a169ce19747553@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2565/483265388@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2565@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2565@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Crypto retx timeout should have higher priority than time based loss detection (#2565)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cb48f92735bb_4f2c3f8df68d45b4216513"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0JI8gEBKrxQSM0bnWZVxJA+ynaoQarNEscSO jaYtiyosimNlUBnWrIAcdZfsY4Pcj/T0ehmhWLePKets2wZ+HTqqBsLCKY3RQ+n3yh+HlSTPqUPCPk h8gusEBb/3XmcoxNL/mPD4+t0QPu1AR3StD2co7bYXUvV97eA1AZCv0haw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/9FAWlevSaTmaOEuyEd9Jpkaf1II>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 14:05:21 -0000

I sent out an editorial PR to clarify why time based loss detection has higher priority.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2565#issuecomment-483265388

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email