Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve KEY_PHASE description (#43)
ianswett <notifications@github.com> Fri, 09 December 2016 11:59 UTC
Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A2812A485 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 03:59:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.512
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.512 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TpgudyYNwCRN for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 03:59:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o11.sgmail.github.com (o11.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BA2012A49C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 03:49:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=Z/pkC6ntz6f7s6l7AlxcXKVwM4c=; b=Nxada/rYmgafgkcV SkbcK8ZPCUMgN6i/Xdin0ZUHKHsZRtgg/E1nd4fvpzWAOkCzzywkQLd41sAAHKW9 G9cn8htWb8hZ4a9yrJCntDjhF/wWeMJcnn4/KA/zgRzFRBBUjSnaMk/HuLcu/Gfx AZKZ/d4g8erpYwrv+Wc8ugqL8bk=
Received: by filter0501p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0501p1mdw1-30213-584A9A56-16 2016-12-09 11:49:42.380358169 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0005p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id 96Hn8D1_SG6QuyK9DNnoJA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 11:49:42.317 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 03:49:42 -0800
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/43/review/12213963@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/43@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/43@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve KEY_PHASE description (#43)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_584a9a563990c_397a3f93c4673134166204a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2asB4iBJgX8ektAP5+CLnvuV4krqBwsP32mQ 9jRjf2UKQUgs6bCSQf54pHJGUjk2s0k7NS5NZcbMT5DcgmEbWtb6kXhvDrDztERsR1VuqLkLPAY4dy 80BstBjJOcfU/d3T4HxbEsloBEuStaswxdXqCZuPchZBMjWLbgs5kiCQ5D2hdwJWOHcHv2nHPBtM4r 8=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/9GU31c5JUfkQMqFWhT5WCpTx9vM>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab23b3a43c6789ade0302c7b5c177dfb91b36f989192cf0000000114625c5692a169ce0b74c956@reply.github.com>
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 11:59:22 -0000
ianswett commented on this pull request. > +decrypt these packets, which will be unsuccessful. Though a server that has +1-RTT keys can safely discard any unprotected handshake messages from the +client, an unprotected ACK frame could indicate that the server needs to +retransmit its own handshake messages. ACK frames therefore cannot be +discarded. + +Until the server has received a positive acknowledgment for all of its +unprotected handshake messages, either in the form of an explicit acknowledgment +or implicitly through the use of 1-RTT keys, it MUST NOT discard packets with a +KEY_PHASE of 0 if they cannot be decrypted successfully. If these packets are +unprotected and contain ACK frames, those ACK frames MUST be recovered and used +to determine whether to retransmit TLS handshake messages. + +TBD: + +: We could observe/require that all unprotected packets are marked with a Agreed, let's go with this. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/43
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve KEY_PHASE descriptio… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve KEY_PHASE descri… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve KEY_PHASE descri… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve KEY_PHASE descri… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve KEY_PHASE descri… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve KEY_PHASE descri… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve KEY_PHASE descri… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve KEY_PHASE descri… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve KEY_PHASE descri… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve KEY_PHASE descri… Dragana Damjanovic
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve KEY_PHASE descri… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve KEY_PHASE descri… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve KEY_PHASE descri… Martin Thomson