Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Replace use of the TLS presentation language with QUIC encoding (#3108)

Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Tue, 29 October 2019 06:32 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D16120048 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 23:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.596
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XJQ_hApVkqqi for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 23:32:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-23.smtp.github.com (out-23.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72B72120020 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 23:32:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-3a0df0f.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-3a0df0f.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.25.92]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B5A6606B6 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 23:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1572330737; bh=UzTC4S6Zc8JTbn5wVxVN3Z1bTMna3QYyRQsposj9bmc=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=RztuU8oVn2khQ2oIajUUd6vibyUM2vsk+5RecVwGOm/b+978FVVCnuIt6cN3LOHiM B4DHd69jPs6KZQ8FAn6ft6aiEheOPAuooI2jOz4U89GKPTePGr2YXrP9TIo3kW/SQQ YiqO24mlpzb17g4wDAnTVNREk1Pq4ov0rqgJH0j8=
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 23:32:17 -0700
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK24DRJBFCJUZWFP7UV3YUHXDEVBNHHB4UDBJ4@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3108/review/308295876@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3108@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3108@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Replace use of the TLS presentation language with QUIC encoding (#3108)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5db7dcf190808_92e3fb2b1ccd960474248"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/9MMTTKI0IuIcE_EANkc3uSrtEzQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 06:32:20 -0000

kazuho commented on this pull request.



>  
 ~~~
-   struct {
-     opaque ipv4Address[4];
-     uint16 ipv4Port;
-     opaque ipv6Address[16];
-     uint16 ipv6Port;
-     opaque connectionId<0..20>;
-     opaque statelessResetToken[16];
-   } PreferredAddress;
+ 0                   1                   2                   3
+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
++-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+|                       IPv4 Address (32)                       |
++-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+|         IPv4 Port (16)        |
++-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Seriously, I believe the diagram should be left as-is.

IIUC, our convention is to wrap the lines in cases where the following field is bigger than 32-bits. Or do we want to wrap the Version field of long header packets?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3108#discussion_r339910157