Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow ClientHello to span multiple QUIC packets (#3045)

ekr <notifications@github.com> Tue, 01 October 2019 20:48 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15BC6120089 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 13:48:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CTKv8-rYUScX for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 13:48:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-24.smtp.github.com (out-24.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22BA612006F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 13:48:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-25680bd.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-25680bd.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.17.61]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2133A6A0541 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 13:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 13:48:23 -0700
From: ekr <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZ43WTAQDTHRTN7B4N3UD6CPEVBNHHB26JPGY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3045/review/295883707@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3045@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3045@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow ClientHello to span multiple QUIC packets (#3045)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d93bb9712bea_18373f9f2dacd9682491f1"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ekr
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/9OsFbDMrbSUsVdnHtGQif9VrGzA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 20:48:26 -0000

ekr approved this pull request.

LGTM

> -cryptographic handshake message, MUST fit in a single UDP datagram (see
-{{handshake}}).  The first CRYPTO frame sent always begins at an offset of 0
-(see {{handshake}}).
-
-Note that if the server sends a HelloRetryRequest, the client will send a second
-Initial packet.  This Initial packet will continue the cryptographic handshake
-and will contain a CRYPTO frame with an offset matching the size of the CRYPTO
-frame sent in the first Initial packet.  Cryptographic handshake messages
-subsequent to the first do not need to fit within a single UDP datagram.
+the start or all of the first cryptographic handshake message.  The first
+CRYPTO frame sent always begins at an offset of 0 (see {{handshake}}).
+
+Note that if the server sends a HelloRetryRequest, the client will send another
+series of Initial packets.  These Initial packets will continue the
+cryptographic handshake and will contain CRYPTO frames starting at an offset
+matching the size of the CRYPTO frames sent in the first flight of Initial

"matching the size" is a bit odd. Perhaps "immediately after the last byte of..."

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3045#pullrequestreview-295883707