[quicwg/base-drafts] f8425c: Clarify some PMTU language (#1037)
martinduke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Fri, 12 January 2018 21:58 UTC
Return-Path: <bounce+565321.40f-quic-issues=ietf.org@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C64127871 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 13:58:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hyNsWZQjt4-R for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 13:58:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from m71-131.mailgun.net (m71-131.mailgun.net [166.78.71.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7AED124BE8 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 13:58:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; q=dns/txt; s=mailo; t=1515794300; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: Mime-Version: Subject: Message-ID: To: Reply-To: From: Date: Sender; bh=979hXgec0Jdnls4btLg5aiOWeCJ+JJelNTBVOhI66ZU=; b=Eqoja3XYR/9wNgNc0uJNxfiylyHLVO+X0bWLin4nLuv48eKeqlI3fclWszHmSuLlfa21t2XU F4A89PrALlIud//0qDe29qSdoXStI83oYAaucGbenqzUfX+uv3bxjsCsAU/botAgqTmwg/82 V/ukOOdG1+wG8eu/KR1pFbAspIg=
X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 166.78.71.131
X-Mailgun-Sid: WyJhNzYyYiIsICJxdWljLWlzc3Vlc0BpZXRmLm9yZyIsICI0MGYiXQ==
Sender: martin.h.duke=gmail.com@github.com
Received: from github.com (Unknown [192.30.252.35]) by mxa.mailgun.org with ESMTP id 5a592f7c.7f52643c5810-smtp-out-n03; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 21:58:20 -0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 13:58:19 -0800
From: martinduke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Reply-To: martinduke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
To: quic-issues@ietf.org
Message-ID: <5a592f7b202dd_60182ad8d7963c0c622d6@hookshot-fe-d252ca1.cp1-iad.github.net.mail>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] f8425c: Clarify some PMTU language (#1037)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--==_mimepart_5a592f7b1ff5f_60182ad8d7963c0c62153"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/9Tkncog2FEMbJcUfg6BLoKfV3ew>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 21:58:23 -0000
Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts Commit: f8425c1ea712898f15f05a3829ba9e3f31f27e43 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/commit/f8425c1ea712898f15f05a3829ba9e3f31f27e43 Author: martinduke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Date: 2018-01-12 (Fri, 12 Jan 2018) Changed paths: M draft-ietf-quic-transport.md Log Message: ----------- Clarify some PMTU language (#1037) * Update draft-ietf-quic-transport.md The introductory text to the packet size section has some syntax problems: - It makes it sound like the Initial packet can be below 1200 Bytes - The 1200 Byte restriction could, in principle, apply to an out of order 0RTT packet - The "allow receipt" restriction is vague; the new language is IMO more prescriptive. * Remove trailing whitespace