Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Short abstract (#92)
janaiyengar <notifications@github.com> Thu, 12 January 2017 06:01 UTC
Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E34F012948B for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 22:01:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.355
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.355 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.156, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ivX_Fy4wZPGQ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 22:01:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o9.sgmail.github.com (o9.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29ECB129479 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 22:01:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=p5gRuEqchLUrASOdzEkDoMeor6o=; b=czD8JVAKyA9cfUJv dzpjfpdLWLV2sNp1yGMHA5VJ/o90Jw6oNNXqtfFpdbm2/FJ0lQaRfQ3rLO0ZzTAF Mh0Feq3FqeKDiHBT7izcd4XCYUM5BWqpBz5CB+b2vwUKGtBjWP5GrJncm50wgUkG HkLul9xGmJ7PrZd2isI/P5Gk8q8=
Received: by filter0498p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0498p1mdw1-10807-58771BB4-2F 2017-01-12 06:01:24.766748846 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0005p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id 1yErMISnQdGxuU9AzLinBg for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 06:01:24.582 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 22:01:24 -0800
From: janaiyengar <notifications@github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/92/c272083540@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/92@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/92@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Short abstract (#92)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_58771bb477b20_293e73f8d15f191401090f2"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak35MdYRtKXRcGgQINYZ1sRnlPPaIgO4jePxqg kvTC1lmP/FIT3mxYuyI+y0PBkfis/xL5bw5V9STUbf0W2C0Liix8/MM2m6mLEBNkHOJollA7QzHOVk Twfs4vQaXmZtcZqxa9uFEKLQ05u3/VFiy+1WJGHundpx53MtmSYTjIBYOb8u88PH7HFNiO3EfV/8D2 A=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/9UaA6Iv5Js4Pj9oBaJs7zHSvSNE>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: quic@ietf.org
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 06:01:31 -0000
I agree that the abstract should be concise and not have motivation in it. But there's over cutting here -- there's a purpose to the abstract beyond just the title :-) I would at least leave some text about what is in the document. I would add the following in: "This document describes the core QUIC protocol, including the conceptual design, wire format, and mechanisms of the QUIC protocol for connection establishment, wire format, and mechanisms of the QUIC protocol for connection establishment, stream multiplexing, stream and connection-level flow control, and data stream multiplexing, stream and connection-level flow control, and data-reliability. Accompanying documents describe QUIC's loss detection and reliability." -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/92#issuecomment-272083540
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Short abstract (#92) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Short abstract (#92) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Short abstract (#92) janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Short abstract (#92) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Short abstract (#92) Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Short abstract (#92) Sean Turner
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Short abstract (#92) ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Short abstract (#92) janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Short abstract (#92) janaiyengar