Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ALPN Tokens and Alt-Svc (#90)

[Mike Bishop <[e-mail]>]

MikeBishop commented on this pull request.



> +
+Only implementations of the final, published RFC can identify themselves as 
+"hq". Until such an RFC exists, implementations MUST NOT identify themselves 
+using these strings. 
+
+Implementations of draft versions of the protocol MUST add the string "-" and 
+the corresponding draft number to the identifier. For example, 
+draft-ietf-quic-http-01 is identified using the string "hq-01". 
+
+Non-compatible experiments that are based on these draft versions MUST append 
+the string "-" and an experiment name to the identifier. For example, an 
+experimental implementation based on draft-ietf-quic-http-09 which reserves an 
+extra stream for unsolicited transmission of 1980s pop music might identify
+itself as "hq-09-rickroll". Note that any label MUST conform to the "token"
+syntax defined in Section 3.2.6 of [RFC7230]. Experimenters are encouraged to
+coordinate their experiments on the [e-mail] mailing list.

Bah, yes.  That's what I get for assuming mailing list norms stayed the same and copying text from the HTTP/2 spec.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/90