Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Prevent connection ID exhaustion (#1468)

Kazuho Oku <> Fri, 22 June 2018 03:03 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDAC4130DD2 for <>; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.01
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6j0TXmlKYbuh for <>; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EACF5130DD1 for <>; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:03:29 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1529636609; bh=rGeykfvNYU1myz+GxSjELjTIDzl7JJ4GDnrSm+0brI0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=XD7ls8tUK7pZNqzpSZ6YfoaPWqMwl+Yjfcxkrtk6iXCKh52zsYnALwHgi1UxrqtDs yo3ZLVdiB5gju5BTDzbZ3eCFJaAcA9jDZZoWXC7ucaAokqilZL5bSo49cXOZpOab+D yqVO/+irfpvdV6oNML0VL/R36O1Hy2O573Xa8ra0=
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1468/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Prevent connection ID exhaustion (#1468)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b2c6701e4865_39802aded2056f50207646"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 03:03:33 -0000

Am I correct in assuming that we would have a sequence number in this proposed approach?

I think that we need it, otherwise an eternal ping-pong might happen. Of course we can prevent eternal ping-pong from happening by having a `is_pong` flag. But I would assume that it would be more straightforward (and descriptive) to have a sequence number.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: