IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Server should not accept 1-RTT traffic before handshake completion (#3159)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Wed, 30 October 2019 07:52 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44AFF120088 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:52:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oyXQKmMzMtiG for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:52:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-20.smtp.github.com (out-20.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.203]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B740F120026 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:52:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-f144ac1.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-f144ac1.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.16.59]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72958C0774 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1572421958; bh=k4CZrnWv7DcaAtUG4vWFylG9yZUPqLVaYyYCYgfPYVM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=tCVYN7FcZHiht0diOccBWgeafmTb9djqA6cKCtNGBYwc0s2FPRgHRh/h9oaNRtB6y aa8w7by6aDHC2TvirOC2RGBrAJGmvGCFwy9LK6BMfu1qNqZUvpkrBsFcWPzj36IZg3 V6GWyWXhu4TSMjfjbUwrKYHN2PGNSWGLS/H6Rufs=
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:52:38 -0700
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK3TYLR7C4IBNCZTUZN3YZZ4NEVBNHHB5FZ3ZY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3159/547778190@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3159@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3159@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Server should not accept 1-RTT traffic before handshake completion (#3159)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5db94146c7d2d_3c283f7e13acd96c448959"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/9edyEvZwh9c9JYXnIvmjftBOSjs>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 07:52:41 -0000

@marten-seemann it's disruptive also because of possible ongoing hardware design. That said, if it is important enough to fix ...

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3159#issuecomment-547778190

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email