Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Introduce terms dynamic table capacity and maximum dynamic table capacity. (#2115)

[Martin Thomson <[e-mail]>]

martinthomson approved this pull request.

This is a good change.

> @@ -650,32 +656,31 @@ entries which are frequently referenced, both to avoid the need to resend the
 header and to avoid the entry in the table blocking the ability to insert new
 headers.
 
-### Dynamic Table Size Update {#size-update}
+### Dynamic Table Capacity Update {#capacity-update}

```suggestion
### Set Dynamic Table Capacity {#set-capacity}
```

Is this a better formulation?  Set is more direct.

Note that there are more places to fix than this, but you get the idea.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2115#pullrequestreview-190572704