Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference too big (#1404)
afrind <notifications@github.com> Fri, 01 June 2018 23:51 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D52412E049 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 16:51:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K9dz8DMSDlRS for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 16:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-4.smtp.github.com (out-4.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB88912E048 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 16:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 16:51:22 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1527897082; bh=mjNu20LjtekM7n5Ro23EEAJHgSfkYdp2gI/F+NNAHWc=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=xH6+6UbeTeSrsfM0rHkqaQtwO8kfis14ggag2ZoVzdvGNKOj2M/YQGv15JSrf7B4h uzObH4n7oab968FOzr7XnltIqpin2n+W+syg8VyouLFaP0EJ9nPvCmTh9uzLSYzJdg I6OfpFfqyJ6asg/RvIttxPqyRJPdNGM4Qy+IeHPA=
From: afrind <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab06b2846a88ef14e260d56b89a2399c96ec99716592cf0000000117299dfa92a169ce138cb60c@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1404/394037495@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1404@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1404@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference too big (#1404)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b11dbfa1a4b3_42423f8123e9cf8026947e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: afrind
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/A8EmBVavzV_tcw65XIWxN-6WAHY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:51:24 -0000
I can't imagine a scenario where a non-buggy, non-malicious encoder would do this on purpose and needs only the threat of an error to prevent it. But I don't want to prevent a server from calling it an error either. If everyone likes MAY I can live with it. Related question: If a decoder is required to treat something as an error and it doesn't, does the encoder treat the decoder's permissiveness as an error? No encoder would ever check that, so it's really just about declaring your implementation conforms to the specification? Or guidance so you don't accidentally get yourself into trouble? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1404#issuecomment-394037495
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference too bi… afrind
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference too big (#… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference too bi… afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference too bi… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference too bi… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference too bi… afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference too bi… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference too bi… afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference too bi… Mike Bishop