Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can Initial/0-RTT CIDs safely be used for routing? (#2026)

janaiyengar <> Wed, 21 November 2018 23:33 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93DE7128D0C for <>; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 15:33:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.46
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j9AWd1IxUXIr for <>; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 15:33:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1CB9130DD4 for <>; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 15:33:29 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 15:33:28 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1542843208; bh=CDfxbZv7SbwoNYIsOVvOrEhCIUH75Q3y6jho9QT3HzQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=vS0ZodWmAkc6CfcPcQUfkFCLa0ukKTSRNw6UZM1l5/RurqX124S4WaIHXzeqYVkE8 eyRwRtjmeq2HeKWJzbVi5Bwr8m/wnjdcUQJ87bYfaChcpsKKJi9W8merfwo/Tll2+3 ZmR40OfOF5YDoC+B2iaEmtKW3Aa0UfHMG7POTFUQ=
From: janaiyengar <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2026/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can Initial/0-RTT CIDs safely be used for routing? (#2026)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bf5eb48d0a90_3ae53ffb4d2d45b419215a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 23:33:32 -0000

@martinthomson : I don't think there is any text that suggests a server "not attach too much significance to values chosen by clients".

Do folks think it might be useful to add to Security Considerations?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: