Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Security considerations (#1562)
janaiyengar <notifications@github.com> Sat, 14 July 2018 18:24 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22332130E77 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 11:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gG1vRavcfHhp for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 11:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F12A129C6B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 11:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 11:24:23 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1531592663; bh=0QOdkq8aBKJrYMYUh4GnSwjCkhkRNiSdvwRwLmS/hn4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=IG6hGLkRcOHEKlJ3SkbVUtw16BqY6BYwsdUj4KFoAiJDvNozS9SQ1B/eY3DTrkeBX YAkDCNIQzBwtpY9wbyFrHVxzS74mni93wQA1nEuIH7Op3YxAUSmEFlN8evw9UHchjB 60Mmp3Z+MKH6QkBTMz2tMlxFG4YgmEtZfXWRl5Nw=
From: janaiyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abe7355ce62980555280fa260660aa166bbc226e5992cf00000001176201d792a169ce14571c59@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1562/review/137245304@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1562@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1562@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Security considerations (#1562)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b4a3fd78c394_4cb2ae55309af5c101099"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ACbRCMU-dd5qB1DV_j8cUuy7h6I>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 18:24:26 -0000
janaiyengar commented on this pull request.
> @@ -1148,6 +1148,23 @@ retransmission timeout has been verified.
congestion_window = kMinimumWindow
~~~
+# Security Considerations
+
+## Local Denial of Service
+
+QUIC requires congestion control, and recommends Reno. Not using a
+congestion control algorithm or using an overly aggressive
+algorithm may cause flows sharing the same link to experience
+excess delay, packet loss, and timeouts.
I don't think we need this one. I'll add a paragraph that says something about congestion control being required and Reno being the one that we describe in this doc, and point to 8085 for the rest.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1562#pullrequestreview-137245304
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Security considerations (#15… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Security considerations … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Security considerations … janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Security considerations … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Security considerations … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Security considerations … janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Security considerations … janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Security considerations … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Security considerations … ianswett