Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)
ekr <notifications@github.com> Thu, 06 February 2020 10:33 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DF6120233 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 02:33:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hNM-Axm0mQ5a for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 02:33:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-24.smtp.github.com (out-24.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A2BD1200D6 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 02:33:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-fb56993.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-fb56993.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.19.31]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E746A1238 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 02:33:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1580985224; bh=cnpfA/nrp99PtGcaq8lncnXSrlr4lRUuLIOxBHF1o5c=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Nt2v0jhpiYInAVuyjj1enhzDtq5M2gAonBgCi0WQ1jiQY8GDIas0gq/lELCbTFYRd 2bBFZ9FicV5yRQioe8R+pRH2hBscWVFDn+8OpZyakY14Pklq6ijQxW+nECMIeJWPKL myyqzedri5u947bFPjeVj9TWd1cOhsST/ij82It0=
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 02:33:44 -0800
From: ekr <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK7NWV37AKAZOJRW5J54JEPAREVBNHHCC3RXUI@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3430/582839341@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3430@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3430@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames are forbidden in 0-RTT (#3430)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e3beb88d3599_1f413ff09a2cd95c152649"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ekr
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/AFbcrHzcDkMTAGjJUg3z1fehAqY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 10:33:47 -0000
It seemed to me that the principle MT was espousing was that we don't forbid any frames in 0-RTT and just note in the draft the frames where some other rule made it impossible to send a conformant frame in 0-RTT. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3430#issuecomment-582839341
- [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some frames… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some fr… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some fr… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some fr… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some fr… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some fr… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some fr… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some fr… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some fr… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unclear if some fr… Jana Iyengar